IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

ivl.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The climate impact of energy peat utilisation - comparison and sensitivity analysis of Finnish and Swedish results
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
2006 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [sv]

The climate impact of energy peat utilisation have been studied both in Finland by VTT Technical Research Centre and in Sweden by IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd. The main objective of this study is to compare the results of earlier studies by VTT and IVL and to perform a sensitivity analysis of previous and new results. The scientific approach of the two studies is very similar. The climate impact of peat utilisation is considered from a life-cycle point of view by taking into account all phases of the peat utilisation chain (peat production, storing, transport, combustion and after-treatment of the peat production area). Peat reserves can be both sinks and sources of greenhouse gas emissions as well as there are both uptake and emissions of greenhouse gases during the utilisation chain. Both sinks and sources are considered in the calculations. The net impact of the utilisation chain is assessed as the climate impact due to the utilisation chain minus the climate impact of non-utilisation chain (i.e. the reference scenario where the peat reserve is left in its initial state). The calculation methodology of the climate impact of energy peat utilisation is similar in the Swedish and the Finnish study. The instantaneous radiative forcing and accumulated radiative forcing are used in both studies as the indicator of the climate impact. Radiative forcing is calculated on the basis of the concentration changes due to emissions and uptake of greenhouse gases. The differences in the models for calculating concentrations and radiative forcing are minor. There are some differences in the definitions and boundaries of the considered peat utilisation chains, although the differences in the results due to differences in the chain definitions are small. The main reason for the differences in results between the two studies is differences in emission (and uptake) estimates for the after-treatment phase and the non-utilisation chain (i.e. reference scenario). There are many similarities between the results of Swedish and Finnish studies. Both Swedish and Finnish studies show that the use of cultivated peatland for energy peat utilisation results in lower climate impact than using coal (within 100 years). Both studies show that the use of pristine mires for peat production will result in larger climate impact than the use of already drained peatlands.

Abstract [en]

The climate impact of energy peat utilisation have been studied both in Finland by VTT Technical Research Centre and in Sweden by IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute Ltd. The main objective of this study is to compare the results of earlier studies by VTT and IVL and to perform a sensitivity analysis of previous and new results. The scientific approach of the two studies is very similar. The climate impact of peat utilisation is considered from a life-cycle point of view by taking into account all phases of the peat utilisation chain (peat production, storing, transport, combustion and after-treatment of the peat production area). Peat reserves can be both sinks and sources of greenhouse gas emissions as well as there are both uptake and emissions of greenhouse gases during the utilisation chain. Both sinks and sources are considered in the calculations. The net impact of the utilisation chain is assessed as the climate impact due to the utilisation chain minus the climate impact of non-utilisation chain (i.e. the reference scenario where the peat reserve is left in its initial state). The calculation methodology of the climate impact of energy peat utilisation is similar in the Swedish and the Finnish study. The instantaneous radiative forcing and accumulated radiative forcing are used in both studies as the indicator of the climate impact. Radiative forcing is calculated on the basis of the concentration changes due to emissions and uptake of greenhouse gases. The differences in the models for calculating concentrations and radiative forcing are minor. There are some differences in the definitions and boundaries of the considered peat utilisation chains, although the differences in the results due to differences in the chain definitions are small. The main reason for the differences in results between the two studies is differences in emission (and uptake) estimates for the after-treatment phase and the non-utilisation chain (i.e. reference scenario). There are many similarities between the results of Swedish and Finnish studies. Both Swedish and Finnish studies show that the use of cultivated peatland for energy peat utilisation results in lower climate impact than using coal (within 100 years). Both studies show that the use of pristine mires for peat production will result in larger climate impact than the use of already drained peatlands.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet, 2006.
Series
B report ; B1681
Keywords [sv]
Peat, climate change, climate impact, radiative forcing, energy production, greenhouse gas emission, carbon dioxide, methane, nitrous oxide, life cycle analysis, coal
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ivl:diva-2455OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ivl-2455DiVA, id: diva2:1551898
Available from: 2021-05-05 Created: 2021-05-05 Last updated: 2021-05-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1036 kB)31 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1036 kBChecksum SHA-512
4e9e32ca2b3f19d5f923c5f097c1b0430993a8c87b8adccdb9467c15e20ffffaa72db2ef0f49fea1fc632c2100369fadf399d48174611dbc40d7eca6eaff6084
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Holmgren, Kristina
By organisation
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 31 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 56 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf