IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

ivl.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Options for increased low-risk recycling of building products
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
2016 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [sv]

Materials containing chemical substances with hazardous properties may, under certain conditions generate undesirable emissions of such chemicals during the use phase, as well as during recycling and other types of waste treatment. Since recycling of materials is a key element in the movement towards a circular economy it is crucial that the recycling is conducted in way that minimizes the risk associated with exposure to hazardous chemicals. Construction and demolition waste is a category of products where large volumes of waste are managed. In addition, new construction is very resource- and energy-intensive, which is why increased recycling is desirable from a waste, energy and resource perspective. Meanwhile many of the older building products which are now appearing as waste due to demolition and re-construction, contain potentially harmful substances such as various plasticizers, flame retardants, anti-corrosion and waterproofing additives, etc. Chemicals which have been phased-out from new materials may thus remain in the technosphere due to recycling of older materials. The EU target for recycling of construction and demolition waste is set to 70 percent by the year 2020 and development of reliable procedures for waste management, recycling and risk assessment for this product group are desirable.

Based on current knowledge on recycling methods for construction goods and chemical contents we have specifically studied four building product categories: PVC floor, plaster waste, flat glass and EPS boards which were selected based on a set of selected criteria. Opportunities and obstacles for increased recycling were highlighted for each product category. Specific attention was also given to the demolition process, as it precedes recycling and reuse of any type of construction material. The following aspects were studied: recyclability with current methods, pre-treatment requirements to guarantee safe materials, the possibility to carry out risk assessments with regard to hazardous substances and use area as well as recyclability for other purposes than the products’ original function. The study was mainly carried out through literature studies and interviews/visits with relevant actors.

Out of the four product categories the largest potential for climate savings was estimated to arise from increased recycling of EPS, a material group with low content of hazardous chemicals (in Sweden and depending on the production year). Although the environmental burdens for the other product groups are lower in comparison to that of EPS, increasing recycling for these products would still carry with it significant climate savings. For product groups where recycling techniques and infrastructure are already in place i.e. for plaster and glass, increasing recycling rates could be achieved with relatively little effort. Increased selective demolition and on-site sorting of construction and demolition waste is of great importance to enable an increase of the recycling of building products, and also to better control the occurrence and flow of chemicals throughout the product lifetime and through waste and recycling stages. This is especially true for building products that already have a functioning recycling process with no significant problems regarding hazardous substances e.g. plaster boards and flat glass. Through selective demolition, it is possible to increase recycling rates in a relatively short time. However, even though selective demolition is often a requirement from ordering clients in demolition purchasing involving actors within the public sector, follow-ups are rare and most likely selective demolition does not occur to sufficient extent. The main obstacle to increased selective demolition is the lack of incentive due to the high cost compared to incineration of mixed fractions since the value of the sorted material is not sufficient to compete with conventional treatment. Much larger volumes of waste are needed for the value to be sufficient in relation to transportation costs (true for e.g. plastic). Lack of spacefor containers is also an obstacle. Therefore selective demolition is more common on larger demolition sites. Economic instruments need to be implemented to increase the application of selective demolition.

The results from the project showed that hazardous chemicals are not the main obstacle to increased recycling of building products, rather it has to do with costs and access to recycling facilities. Thus economic instruments and improved logistics and infrastructure may promote increased recycling.

Den här rapporten finns endast på engelska. Svensk sammanfattning finns i rapporten.

Abstract [en]

Materials containing chemical substances with hazardous properties may, under certain conditions generate undesirable emissions of such chemicals during the use phase, as well as during recycling and other types of waste treatment. Since recycling of materials is a key element in the movement towards a circular economy it is crucial that the recycling is conducted in way that minimizes the risk associated with exposure to hazardous chemicals. Construction and demolition waste is a category of products where large volumes of waste are managed. In addition, new construction is very resource- and energy-intensive, which is why increased recycling is desirable from a waste, energy and resource perspective. Meanwhile many of the older building products which are now appearing as waste due to demolition and re-construction, contain potentially harmful substances such as various plasticizers, flame retardants, anti-corrosion and waterproofing additives, etc. Chemicals which have been phased-out from new materials may thus remain in the technosphere due to recycling of older materials. The EU target for recycling of construction and demolition waste is set to 70 percent by the year 2020 and development of reliable procedures for waste management, recycling and risk assessment for this product group are desirable.

Based on current knowledge on recycling methods for construction goods and chemical contents we have specifically studied four building product categories: PVC floor, plaster waste, flat glass and EPS boards which were selected based on a set of selected criteria. Opportunities and obstacles for increased recycling were highlighted for each product category. Specific attention was also given to the demolition process, as it precedes recycling and reuse of any type of construction material. The following aspects were studied: recyclability with current methods, pre-treatment requirements to guarantee safe materials, the possibility to carry out risk assessments with regard to hazardous substances and use area as well as recyclability for other purposes than the products’ original function. The study was mainly carried out through literature studies and interviews/visits with relevant actors.

Out of the four product categories the largest potential for climate savings was estimated to arise from increased recycling of EPS, a material group with low content of hazardous chemicals (in Sweden and depending on the production year). Although the environmental burdens for the other product groups are lower in comparison to that of EPS, increasing recycling for these products would still carry with it significant climate savings. For product groups where recycling techniques and infrastructure are already in place i.e. for plaster and glass, increasing recycling rates could be achieved with relatively little effort. Increased selective demolition and on-site sorting of construction and demolition waste is of great importance to enable an increase of the recycling of building products, and also to better control the occurrence and flow of chemicals throughout the product lifetime and through waste and recycling stages. This is especially true for building products that already have a functioning recycling process with no significant problems regarding hazardous substances e.g. plaster boards and flat glass. Through selective demolition, it is possible to increase recycling rates in a relatively short time. However, even though selective demolition is often a requirement from ordering clients in demolition purchasing involving actors within the public sector, follow-ups are rare and most likely selective demolition does not occur to sufficient extent. The main obstacle to increased selective demolition is the lack of incentive due to the high cost compared to incineration of mixed fractions since the value of the sorted material is not sufficient to compete with conventional treatment. Much larger volumes of waste are needed for the value to be sufficient in relation to transportation costs (true for e.g. plastic). Lack of spacefor containers is also an obstacle. Therefore selective demolition is more common on larger demolition sites. Economic instruments need to be implemented to increase the application of selective demolition.

The results from the project showed that hazardous chemicals are not the main obstacle to increased recycling of building products, rather it has to do with costs and access to recycling facilities. Thus economic instruments and improved logistics and infrastructure may promote increased recycling.

Abstract [sv]

The overall aim of this project was to investigate opportunities to increase the recycling of construction and demolition waste, without increasing the risk of negative effects on humans and wildlife due to recycling of undesirable hazardous chemicals. Based on current knowledge on recycling methods for construction goods and chemical contents we have specifically studied four building product categories: PVC floor, plaster waste, flat glass and EPS boards which were selected based on a set of selected criteria.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet, 2016.
Series
B report ; B2269
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ivl:diva-2905ISBN: 978-91-88319-27-2 OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ivl-2905DiVA, id: diva2:1552351
Available from: 2021-05-05 Created: 2021-05-05 Last updated: 2021-05-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2524 kB)77 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2524 kBChecksum SHA-512
adff338d4df10b3a5756641a6c81fcab0797c9e4d022de21d2fc1ac4c40da2e6c3b55198c9d5820096eb923c39c06d433e27e52d2d61a11c6a5ec8dd984f989b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Palm Cousins, AnnaStare Lins, MalinStenmarck, Åsa
By organisation
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 77 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 75 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf