IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

ivl.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Sustainability assessment of pre-treatment methods for plastic waste from hospitals in Sweden
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
2019 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This study presents results of the sustainability assessment of treatment options for plastic waste from hospitals. The work has been carried out within work package five of the RE:Source project “Sustainable treatment of plastic waste from hospitals”. The main research question in the project is whether pre-treatment could remove potential risks and enable more recycling of plastic waste from hospitals. The evaluation is divided into assessment of environmental, economic and social factors. In the environmental assessment, two types of pre-treatment technology and subsequent recycling have been compared with incineration using Life Cycle Assessment (LCA). A qualitative economic assessment investigates cost components connected to different actors in the value chain if pre-treatment were to be introduced. In the qualitative social assessment, interviews have been used to investigate the acceptance, work load and attitudes among staff connected to sorting and pre-treatment of plastic waste.

Results show that pre-treatment and recycling is beneficial from a climate perspective, even with material losses and assumed quality reduction of the recycled material. The pre-treatment solutions are probably too costly to invest in for most hospitals, and the shredding of material in the process presents challenges to subsequent sorting and separation.

There is a delicate balance between work load for employees and separate sorting of different fractions, but there are also success stories where recycling of specific fractions bring revenue to hospitals already today. Key factors for successful sorting include well planned sorting infrastructure, sufficient storage space, good communication and internal quality control.

To facilitate more sustainable procurement of plastics, networking and knowledge sharing between regions would be helpful. Expert support in terms of comparable LCA results and procurement guidelines could also provide support to buyers.

Last, but not least, we found that the motivation of employees is more of a driver than a challenge for increased sorting and recycling: the majority of hospital staff is positive to separate sorting of plastics!

Abstract [sv]

Den här rapporten finns endast på engelska.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet, 2019.
Series
C report ; C383
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ivl:diva-162OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ivl-162DiVA, id: diva2:1549581
Available from: 2021-05-05 Created: 2021-05-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1750 kB)423 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1750 kBChecksum SHA-512
471a2f2b3ff4372fd9cf435557f60b7629cab0c75f2ed8dd44452a44868e72fa9013a3e640a6cef5761c343f3ae2d68353bba244fd10e0b6462c3c2153cf421d
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordin, Hanna Ljungkvist
By organisation
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 427 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 185 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf