IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

ivl.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Användning av företagshälsovård i kommuner och landsting
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
2015 (Swedish)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

In Sweden, municipalities and counties are among the largest employers, with more than a million employees out of Sweden 9 million inhabitants. Sweden is divided into 20 county councils which include four regions which are further divided in 290 municipalities. They are self-governing local authorities; municipalities are responsible for matters relating to the inhabitants of the municipality and the main task of the county councils and regions is healthcare. According to the Swedish work environment act, the employer is responsible for occupational health and safety. Employers are required to cooperate with employees and safety representatives about the work environment and occupational health- and safety management (OHSM). If necessary, the employer is required to consult and use support from external resources as occupational health services provider (OHS) (Swedish Work Environment Authority, 2015). The use of OHS as an expert resource in OHSM is hence strategically important for the prevention of work-related ill-health and accidents. In municipalities and counties the services can be provided by an in-house OHS unit or be purchased from a private OHS provider. The purpose of this study was to identify conditions and key factors for successful collaboration and use of OHS providers’ services in municipalities and counties, leading to preventive and proactive OHSM. Our results demonstrate how a good dialogue between employer, employees and OHS is a key factor for establishing effective use of expert knowledge and support. However, our study found only few cases where the OHSM actors – including managers, participating workers and their safety reps – have a significant role in defining the aims and scope of OHS support. One main finding was that OHS were only to a limited extent consulted on preventive issues. OHS was to a larger extent utilized for reactive tasks, such as rehab, and for curative services, as well as for activities that focused on individual health, such as health promotion e.g. non-smoking programs. Hence, OHSM actors had limited access to expert support from OHS to find, investigate and abate work environment risks. Many human resource (HR) departments have been transformed from being administrative support functions into being strategic business partners within the organizations. In our study, HR were in most cases main contract counterpart to OHS, heading the process for procurement and following up costs and delivered services. This means that HR, representing the management, had a major impact on provided support and services and the interaction with OHS. This jeopardizes the independent and neutral role of OHS. It also resulted in managers as well as workers and safety reps perceiving OHS as a HR resource, ant not as a resource for their local OHSM. The HR task in OHSM was in most cases focused on sick leave and rehab. Hence, the utilization of OHS became focused on individual issues as rehabilitation, curative services and wellness activities. Even though our study shows that public organizations have well established formal structures and rather extensive dialogue between managers and workers/safety reps on OHS issues, there is a lack of interaction and dialogue with OHS about work, workplace risks, causes and solutions. As a consequence, access to OHS support in and about preventive OHSM was limited, both for managers and for safety reps and workers. From this follows that OHS also have limited access to the actual workplaces, and to local knowledge, experiences, activities and discussions on health and safety. Utilization of OHS as an expert resource in preventive OHSM is thus restricted and inefficient This report is only available in Swedish.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet, 2015.
Series
C report ; C125
Keywords [sv]
Företagshälsovård, Arbetsmiljö, Arbetsmiljöarbete, Kommuner och Landsting
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ivl:diva-446OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ivl-446DiVA, id: diva2:1549869
Available from: 2021-05-05 Created: 2021-05-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(2428 kB)211 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 2428 kBChecksum SHA-512
5f1dc993f71b4346a312f6e9d9f463938dbb3b96c83707f291b1c605ce9a36eedb5d761087c2fe14d84b2e098069f6fd84d9b482284136be13ff387d0bb7cc62
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Schmidt, LisaSjöström, John
By organisation
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 211 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 145 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf