IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

ivl.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Climate Impact of Energy Peat Utilisation in Sweden - the Effect of former Land-Use and Aftertreatment
2005 (English)Report (Other academic)
Abstract [sv]

The potential climate impact (radiative forcing) from peat extraction at different types of peatlands (with different land-use history) has been investigated. The climate impact considered emissions/uptake of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide before, during and after the peat extraction and combustion The four types investigated were: 1. Pristine mires 2. Organic agricultural soils 3. Drained forests and 4. Abandoned harvesting area subjected to previous peat extraction. Two types of after-treatments were used in the scenarios: rewetting or afforestation. The climate impact of the use of energy peat in Sweden was estimated based on description of mire type and former land-use of the peat-harvesting areas. The result show that the climate impact of current Swedish use of energy peat will give a smaller climate impact than the use of coal but a larger impact than the use of natural gas. It also shows that there is a potential of reducing the climate impact from peat utilisation by choosing extraction area and aftertreatment methodology.

Abstract [en]

The potential climate impact (radiative forcing) from peat extraction at different types of peatlands (with different land-use history) has been investigated. The climate impact considered emissions/uptake of carbon dioxide, methane and nitrous oxide before, during and after the peat extraction and combustion The four types investigated were: 1. Pristine mires 2. Organic agricultural soils 3. Drained forests and 4. Abandoned harvesting area subjected to previous peat extraction. Two types of after-treatments were used in the scenarios: rewetting or afforestation. The climate impact of the use of energy peat in Sweden was estimated based on description of mire type and former land-use of the peat-harvesting areas. The result show that the climate impact of current Swedish use of energy peat will give a smaller climate impact than the use of coal but a larger impact than the use of natural gas. It also shows that there is a potential of reducing the climate impact from peat utilisation by choosing extraction area and aftertreatment methodology.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet, 2005.
Series
B report ; B1606
Keywords [sv]
Greenhouse gas emissions, peat, radiative forcing, land-use, peat harvesting
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ivl:diva-2503OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ivl-2503DiVA, id: diva2:1551946
Available from: 2021-05-05 Created: 2021-05-05 Last updated: 2021-05-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1646 kB)45 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1646 kBChecksum SHA-512
61ee5c17852438fcba0489378fc5ae9e77db4f4158c03797280d71f3b6c2ec9b6098e795be338e86c9188cfdfbd03c118c81598b6a969190e99a4272358b88ec
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 49 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 76 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf