IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

ivl.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Global environmental and toxicological data of emerging plasticizers: current knowledge, regrettable substitution dilemma, green solution and future perspectives
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, National Engineering Laboratory for Lake Pollution Control and Ecological Restoration, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory for Lake Pollution Control, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Science, Beijing, China;Alpha Planet Institute, Global Environmental and Climate Lab, Beijing, China;O'Neill School of Public and Environmental Affairs, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, 47405, USA.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5738-7881
State Key Laboratory of Environmental Criteria and Risk Assessment, National Engineering Laboratory for Lake Pollution Control and Ecological Restoration, State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory for Lake Pollution Control, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Science, Beijing, China;Alpha Planet Institute, Global Environmental and Climate Lab, Beijing, China.
Department of Chemistry and Environmental Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8382-1522
Department of Chemistry and Environmental Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102, USA.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Green Chemistry, ISSN 1463-9262, E-ISSN 1463-9270, Vol. 26, no 10, p. 5635-5683Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The global plasticizer market is projected to increase from $17 billion in 2022 to $22.5 billion in 2027. Various emerging/alternative plasticizers entered the market following the ban on several phthalate plasticizers because of their harmful effects. However, there are limited data (especially peer-reviewed) on emerging plasticizers’ toxicity and environmental impact. This review compiles available data on toxicity, exposure, environmental effects, and safe production of emerging plasticizers. It identifies gaps in scientific research and provides evidence that emerging plasticizers are potential cases of regrettable substitution.

Several alternative plasticizers, such as acetyl tributyl citrate (ATBC), diisononyl cyclohexane-1,2 dicarboxylate (DINCH), tris-2-ethylhexyl phosphate (TEHP), tricresyl phosphate (TCP), tris-2-ethylhexyl phosphate (TPHP), bis-2-ethylhexyl terephthalate (DEHT), and tris-2-ethylhexyl trimellitate (TOTM), show potential endocrine-disrupting properties and other toxic characteristics. Some chemicals like bis-2-ethylhexyl adipate (DEHA), diisobutyl adipate (DIBA), ATBC, DINCH, bis-2-ethylhexyl sebacate (DOS), diethylene glycol dibenzoate (DEGDB), DEHT, and phosphate esters showed the potential to cause toxicity in aquatic species. Plus, there is great lack of information on compounds like diisononyl adipate (DINA), dibutyl adipate (DBA), diisodecyl adipate (DIDA), dipropylene glycol dibenzoate (DPGDB), dibutyl sebacate (DBS), alkylsulfonic phenyl ester (ASE), trimethyl pentanyl diisobutyrate (TXIB), DEGDB and bis-2-ethylhexyl sebacate (DOS). Some compounds like epoxidized soybean oil (ESBO), castor-oil-mono-hydrogenated acetate (COMGHA), and glycerin triacetate (GTA) are potentially safer or less toxic. Alternative plasticizers such as adipates (log Kow 4.3–10.1), cyclohexane dicarboxylic acids (log Kow 10), phosphate esters (log Kow 2.7–9.5), sebacates (log Kow 6.3–10.1), terephthalates (log Kow 8.4), and vegetable oil derivatives (log Kow 6.4–14.8) have log Kow values that are comparable to phthalate plasticizers (log Kow 7.5–10.4), indicating potential bioaccumulation and health consequences.

Field studies have demonstrated that phosphate esters can undergo bioaccumulation and biomagnification, but there is a lack of bioaccumulation studies for other compounds. We also discuss the metabolism of emerging plasticizers, though data are limited. Our article highlights that numerous alternative compounds display potential health and ecological risks, indicating they might not be suitable substitutes for legacy plasticizers. There is also a lack of scientific data on most emerging plasticizers. This way, we call for increased research and timely regulatory action to prevent global contamination and health risks. Finally, this study presents a scientifically robust protocol to avoid harmful substitutions and ensure the production of safer chemicals.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet, 2024. Vol. 26, no 10, p. 5635-5683
Keywords [en]
emerging plasticizers; regrettable substitution dilemma; green solution
National Category
Earth and Related Environmental Sciences Chemical Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ivl:diva-4505DOI: 10.1039/d3gc03428cLocal ID: A2766OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ivl-4505DiVA, id: diva2:1928258
Note

A-rapport, A2766.

Available from: 2025-01-16 Created: 2025-01-16 Last updated: 2025-09-04

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Qadeer, AbdulWarner, Genoa R.Giovanoulis, GeorgiosAjmal, Zeeshan
In the same journal
Green Chemistry
Earth and Related Environmental SciencesChemical Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 59 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf