IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

ivl.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Different Rules for Plastic Packages: Comparing the Implementationof EU Rules in Sweden and Denmark
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.
Department of Food and Resource Economics, University of Copenhagen.
Department of Food and Resource Economics (IFRO), University of Copenhagen; Department of Technology Management, SINTEF.
2025 (English)In: Europarättslig tidskrift, ISSN 1403-8722, E-ISSN 2002-3561, no 2025 1, p. 45-60Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Policies targeting the reuse and recycling of plastic packaging have been central to the European Union’s circular economy agenda on plastic packaging waste. Recent reforms have shaped a complex and multi-level policy framework that seeks to balance the common EU waste policy goals, the flexibility afforded to Member States in waste treatment, and the preservation of an effective single market for products. This article examines the implementation of the minimum requirements for extended producer responsibility (EPR) in Sweden and Denmark, focusing on the introduction of eco-modulated fees. Using tools of comparative studies, the study identifies both similarities and differences in the implementation.

Contrary to the hypothesis derived from theories of differentiated EU policy implementation—which posits that institutionally well-prepared Member States would enact environmental regulations comprehensively and without significant restrictions—Sweden’s approach was minimalistic. In contrast, Denmark, despite starting its EPR for packaging system from scratch, adopted a comprehensive implementation strategy. Various factors were found to explain these outcomes, including country-specific regulatory contexts and differing timelines in relation to broader EU packaging regulations. The findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the complexities inherent in EU regulatory implementation processes, highlighting the interplay between national contexts and supranational policy frameworks.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet, 2025. no 2025 1, p. 45-60
Keywords [en]
extended producer responsibility; plastic packages; EU policy implementation
National Category
Social Sciences Environmental Studies in Social Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ivl:diva-4580DOI: 10.53292/b5831dac.04a0f7faLocal ID: A10021OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ivl-4580DiVA, id: diva2:1949162
Note

A-rapport; A10021.

Available from: 2025-04-01 Created: 2025-04-01 Last updated: 2025-09-04

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text
By organisation
IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute
In the same journal
Europarättslig tidskrift
Social SciencesEnvironmental Studies in Social Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 124 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf