IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute

ivl.se
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Nordic net-zero: counterbalancing residual emissions in the context of unevenly distributed BECCS potentials
KTH Royal Institute of Technology.ORCID iD: 0009-0000-7012-6918
KTH Royal Institute of Technology;IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7918-4011
2025 (English)In: Climate Policy, ISSN 1469-3062, E-ISSN 1752-7457, p. 1-17Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Attaining net-zero emissions globally requires counterbalancing residual emissions with carbon dioxide removal (CDR), such as bio-energy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS). BECCS potential is unevenly distributed, meaning that regions may have a ‘surplus’ or ‘deficit’ potential relative to the regional need for counterbalancing. Market mechanisms can be used to transfer BECCS outcomes from one region with surplus BECCS potential to another with deficit potential. We analyse the potential for such trade within the Nordic countries. We show that Sweden has a significant theoretical surplus BECCS potential of at least 19 MtCO2/year compared to what is needed to achieve its net-zero target, which could be realized and transferred to other countries based on e.g. Article 6 of the Paris Agreement.

Within the Nordics, Denmark and Iceland could be possible buyers of such outcomes due to their relatively low BECCS potential compared to the prospective need for CDR to achieve long-term climate targets. Norway also has a small BECCS potential, but it likely suffices to reach its ‘low emission society’ target. Finland has a large BECCS potential but will likely need any domestic BECCS towards its net-zero target due to unforeseen changes in forest sinks. The residual emissions in need of counterbalancing estimated in this paper, and, thus, the potential for collaboration for BECCS outcomes, is subject to uncertainty due to vaguely formulated mitigation targets. We recommend that policy makers (i) adopt separate quantified targets for emission reductions and counterbalancing measures, (ii) evaluate whether there is a surplus or deficit domestic CDR potential to reach the targets, and (iii) seek collaborations with other countries as sellers or buyers of CDR, to facilitate net-zero.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: IVL Svenska Miljöinstitutet, 2025. p. 1-17
Keywords [en]
BECCS; residual emissions; net-zero emissions; Nordic carbon neutrality; national GHG mitigation policy; Article 6
National Category
Chemical Engineering Surface- and Corrosion Engineering Polymer Technologies Circular Food Process Technologies Energy Systems Environmental Management
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:ivl:diva-4774DOI: 10.1080/14693062.2025.2546116Local ID: A10128OAI: oai:DiVA.org:ivl-4774DiVA, id: diva2:2009227
Funder
Swedish Energy Agency, P2021-00016
Note

A-rapport;A10128.

Available from: 2025-10-27 Created: 2025-10-27 Last updated: 2025-10-27

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dufour, MalinMöllersten, Kenneth
In the same journal
Climate Policy
Chemical EngineeringSurface- and Corrosion EngineeringPolymer TechnologiesCircular Food Process TechnologiesEnergy SystemsEnvironmental Management

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 59 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf